2 thoughts on “March for Science: Reflections from AGU President Eric Davidson”

  1. Eric,
    Good article, appears balanced. It is good to remain as unbiased as possible. Your statement: “Unlike many kinds of marchers and lobbyists, we are not a special interest group asking for special favors from government for predominantly selfish interests.”, however is not truly unbiased. As a long term member of AGU (since 1970’s), I have worked with and observed a blindspot in academic & government scientists. As an early member of the AGU Development Committee’s creation, it was difficult for me as an “industry scientist” to present ideas that did not resonate with the AGU norm. Remember that academic/government scientists are often “fighting” to protect their programs, pet projects, and ideas. It appeared that opinions from industry were often ignored or called “biased”, while “of course we are unbiased”.
    The best approach is to evaluate opinions, ideas, and thoughts on their merit to help the Earth, and our environment, on the whole while not pigeon-holing or excluding alternative concepts without consideration. As we move forward to provide leadership through the maze of climate change, adaptation and mitigation, lets not forget that infighting between groups for “turf”, as well as institutionalized redundancy and barriers will not help us lead by example nor determine good alternatives.
    Thank you for providing a forum for open discussion

    Reply
  2. It is telling when even the most visible adherents to Anthropogenic climate change parse their words so vaguely as to bring doubt upon themselves. More insecurity from the global warming pseudo-scientists. Even Kevin Trenberth and Thomas Karl (formerly of NOAA) are part of the back-peddling. Note they even place “hiatus” in paratheses to relay the imprecision of this term. Quoting: ” There are a number of uncertainties and knowledge gaps regarding the “hiatus.” This report reviews these issues and also posits insights from a collective set of diverse information that helps us understand what we do and do not know. One salient insight is that the GMST phenomenon is a surface characteristic that does not represent a slowdown in warming of the climate system but rather is an energy redistribution within the oceans. Improved understanding of the ocean distribution and redistribution of heat will help better monitor Earth’s energy budget and its consequences. A review of recent scientific publications on the “hiatus” shows the difficulty and complexities in pinpointing “the oceanic sink of the “missing heat” from the atmosphere and the upper layer of the oceans, which defines the “hiatus.” Advances in “hiatus” research and outlooks (recommendations) are given in this report.” http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016EF000417/full

    Reply

Leave a Comment