2 thoughts on “Use Your Voice to Make the State of Our Union Stronger”

  1. Dear Chris,

    I share your thoughts and concern related to the appreciation of science, research and innovation by the current U.S. Administration. As AGU and the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) celebrate in 2019 their common 100th anniversary and we are looking back to the history of both organizations and history of science to develop a better future for science, you could see the evolution of science perception by national governments. Let me bring you back to 1939, September 1: Germany invaded Poland and the Second World War (WWII) began. At the same time Washington D.C. welcomed more than 800 scientists from more than 30 countries at the 7th IUGG General Assembly. Honorable Cordell Hull, U.S. Secretary of State, sent a welcoming address, and at the close of the General Assembly, the U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt received AGU and IUGG officers in the White House (e.g., Nature, 144, 717-18, 1939; Science, 91, 439-42, 1940). Could you just imagine how busy was the president of the great country at the beginning of WWII? But despite this, he found time to speak to international scientists and to ensure that science is in his heart … And 80 years later, December 2018. 28,000+ scientists from all over the world gathered in Washington D.C. at the AGU Fall Meeting to present and discuss new discoveries and to celebrate scientific achievements. And nobody from the White House or the Department of State welcomed the scientists. That is a modern appreciation of science, and, very unfortunately, but this occurs in many countries, not only in USA. Something should be wrong here. Indeed, we, scientists, should make all possible efforts to convince our governments and the representatives of state legislation about the importance of scientific research and convince them to stand up for science.

    Sincerely,
    Alik Ismail-Zadeh
    IUGG, Secretary General
    International Science Council, Secretary of Council

    Reply
  2. Science is indeed important to our nation. Both parties are treating science as a pawn in their negotiations. AGU is wrong to over-personalize the issue and blame only the chief executive. Extending the wall is a reasonable demand and Congress should support it.

    Reply

Leave a Comment